Add tracking for sales being completed via Mercari. 

While technically the PC-98, Sharp x68000, and FM Towns are "computers," and you could say the games should go under "PC Games, " they don't really belong there. This is because the games that work on the Sharp x68000 may not work on any other system, and likewise for the others.

Taking a specific example then, "My Eyes!" (which can be seen on VNDB here: https://vndb.org/v8980, or here on Moby Games: https://www.mobygames.com/game/my-eyes), was released ONLY for the x68000, FM Towns, and PC-98. There is no version that could be purchased and run on a modern computer, you would need one of those 3 systems specifically (Or an emulator but that's beside the point).

While there isn't thousands of games that are completely exclusive to those systems like that one, I personally believe they fall under the same category as systems like the MSX and Amiga, which are also both technically "Home PCs." The x68000 was even built with some of the same hardware in arcade cabinet machines of the time, it was very obviously meant to have the graphic capabilities for gaming specifically.

All three of these systems are also very popular and have huge game libraries that are bought, sold, and traded frequently. I think it would be very nice to see that information and also allow collectors (such as myself), to be able to have their full collections in one place, rather than having to use other sites for some systems.

All that said, I understand the can of worms argument with which systems should or shouldn't be included as their own categories. If not separating them specifically, maybe there could be another way to slice up the "PC Games" category so that everything doesn't fall under that very, very large umbrella.

Thank you for considering my request, as well as all the hard work put into the site!

NTSC games released in Brazil - although they are also NTSC - have a different rating from the ESRB.

It would be interesting if we could list both information in the descriptions of NTSC games.

The game deal scanner only gets deals from eBay US. I am in the UK and that is no good for me, would be great if it picked up my currency selection is GBP and pick up listings from eBay UK instead as I would never buy anything from US as all the games will be NTSC with high shipping costs to UK.

These are very collectable. 40 years ago. Wow, how can that be. I think it would be a nice edition for us old school gamers that didn't grow up on Nintendo Power. It covered Atari 2600, Intellivision, Colecovision and much more.

I am aware that PS1/PS2 games have “Greatest Hits” entries and GameCube games have separate “Player’s Choice” entries already, but a lot of the time sales of GH/PC versions of games are lumped in with the regular entries.

This usually isn’t a problem, but it is one in some cases where the original print of a game is considerably more valuable than the GH/PC version is.

For instance, the black label version of the first Crash Bandicoot goes for as much as $60 on eBay as opposed to the less valuable Greatest Hits version, but because there are several eBay sales that aren’t explicitly marked as “Greatest Hits”, they get put in with the black label version. This leads to the average CIB value for Black Label CB1 being $32, far less than the actual value of this version of the game. Look through the recent CIB sales on the page and you’ll see what I mean.

As such, I propose that for at least certain games, the title should be changed to say “[Greatest Hits]”, “[Player’s Choice]”, etc. to ensure they’re categorized correctly. This maybe doesn’t need to be done for every game, as in many cases it makes very little if any difference, but at the least some special cases could be made for games whose non-GH/PC versions are notably higher in value, such as Crash Bandicoot.

I see this has already been done with Rayman, another game whose Black Label (jewel case) release is considerably more valuable than the Greatest Hits version. I’m unsure if there are too many other cases that would warrant such a change, but I believe we should at least do it with Crash since it is a pretty substantial difference in value.

I look forward to hearing people’s thoughts. Thanks!

It would be useful to see the price of a game per month in terms of the following:

Per month:

1. Show the highest price sold
2. Show the lowest price sold
3. Show the average price

This is like a stock market candlestick chart without the beginning value and ending value.  It would look something like a cross instead of a candlestick with a body.  The reason is because the average price doesn't tell you everything.  We still want to see what the highest price and lowest price sold was in any given month.  

I’d like to sell my games straight from my collection instead of going over to the sell part of the website. I like seeing all my inventory in front of me rather than leaving it and looking back over and over 

I have a lot of Sealed promo cards that I'd like to record in My Collection properly, currently I have to put them in as "Ungraded" - which although not strictly wrong, it's not an accurate representation of the promo card as they are worth more when still sealed (usually). 

Under your settings, you should have an option to turn off the "You've visited X days in a row" message at the bottom of the home page.  Some people may not like seeing how many times they've visited the site.