
Sort Pokemon cards on number
It would be great if it is possible to sort Pokemon cards on number. Currently I see that it is only possible to sort on "Date added", "Alphabetical" and "Price".

You can't sort search results by the card number, but you can sort the set lists by card number.
https://www.pricecharting.com/console/pokemon-fossil
You browse the site to a particular set and then you can choose a sort order as "Card Number"

More card collection types options!
More card collection types, like marvel cards, x-man cards, music cards, all types of collectable cards should be on here.

Thanks. We want these requests separated by the specific card type so we know which ones to focus on next. For example:
Star Wars Cards:
Please add separate requests for the cards you want added. Then users can vote on them individually and we can add the most popular ones. Thank you

Export collection list to Excel
It would be great to have the ability to export a collection list to Excell

You can do that already.
Go to "Settings". Under "My Account > Settings" in upper right corner of every page.
Click "Export Collection"
Thank you

Edit titles with errors or wrong titles.
I noticed that I am not able to change game titles even for the ones I added (with a mistake).
Is it possible to add that feature ?

search bar type over
until recently i could search for a game and then immediately type over what i had just searched for, it really made looking up multiple games easier.

We are changing back to this being the default behavior. That change should be live later today.

Additional tag and sorting field for Special/Limited/Collector's Edition versions of games
Having the ability to look through the library of a particular console (Xbox 360, for example), and only display non-special edition games would be useful in keeping track of the most valuable titles.

Add Specific Levels of “Completeness” For Consoles
Adding consoles to one’s collection on here is really weird, because it pretty much has the same tiers as a video game entry on the site– “Loose”, “CIB”, and “New”. This complicates things because a console being “Complete” can mean multiple things; it can imply that it has all of the hookups and controllers, or it can mean that it comes in the original box with the paper inserts. Likewise, “Loose” could refer to console only, or the console and hook-ups, etc. but without the box and such.
This leads to a weird level of inconsistency where the recent “CIB” sales are a mix of listings both with and without the console’s box, and the recent “Loose” sales are a mix of console only listings and ones with the console and everything needed to play. As a result, I’m honestly never sure what to choose when putting a console in my collection, since oftentimes it feels like the “Loose” value is lower than what it would go for, whereas the “CIB” value is way too high.
A perfect example is the NES which I happen to own “Complete”- not with the box, but in working with an A/V cable, power adapter and two controllers. Looking at the PriceCharting entry, the “Loose” value for an NES console is currently shown to be $41, largely due to console only sales dragging it down. On the other hand, the “CIB” value is a staggering $202, which is from in-box listings as one can imagine. Neither of these prices quite accurately reflect the value of an NES console with just the hook-ups and controller(s), which I’d wager goes for around $60-100 or so in working condition.
This is a complicated issue, because in a way it challenges the core framework of the website. I get that it’s just straight-up easier to have consoles represented in the same way that any video game is. However, doing such a thing creates enough problems with proper value representation that I think it’s worth brainstorming a better solution.
Maybe we can have it so that you select which specific elements of a console you own, split into simple categories like “console”, “box”, “video cable”, “power adapter”, etc. Or, we could maybe have something similar to how it is now but with a higher number of more specific tiers, like “Loose”, “Console+Cables”, “CIB” and “New”, or something like that. Honestly, I’m not sure, but we should discuss the topic and think of something that functions better than what we have currently for consoles on the site.
I’m hoping we can figure something out because this is an issue that really bugs me. It might be a big change for the site but I think it’s one that’d be positive if we figured out something really solid. Thanks!

Weird sale on Pokemon Red
there is a sold copy on "new" pokemon red with $180 which is wrong. online pokemon red goes for much more in "new"

Added this 2 pack now.
https://www.pricecharting.com/game/amiibo/metroid-dread-samus-&-emmi

Percentage of price increase/decrease over X amount of time.
Currently, Pokémon specifically, is seeing a sharp decrease in the value of cards as compared to a year ago. I believe this is due to the hype created by social media influencers (Logan Pau for example) and then the return to normal pricing thereafter. I would be nice if we could see a list of all the Pokémon with a % of price increase/decrease over the last 1m, 6m, 1y, 5y, all time. In addition, if when looking at the individual cards, a % of price increase/decrease. The line graph seems to not be working at the moment as when searching past prices of any Pokémon cards, it will show the past month but the buttons are not working to look any further into the past. Thanks and be safe!

The charts show all the data that we have. We have about 1 year's worth of pricing for Pokemon cards. Unfortunately we can't go back any further on those charts.
That will be the best tool to see the price increase or decrease by cards.
We have a "Hot Cards" section that will show some items that have increased (or decreased) the most in the last 30 days.
If you change the sort order you can see cards that decreased in value too.
Customer support service by UserEcho