Add "# in Wishlist" data point to the Prices API. This data point is found in the "Item Demand Report"

This is a good data point to look at along side price data to gauge market demand... if item is hot then price could be slightly higher than market rate.

Ability to scan and catalog non-sports cards (Marvel etc.) via reverse image search (more accurate) like hipcomic.com does with comic book covers. 

I have many items that say the value is 0, however there is many sold listings on ebay. A way to link them to the item would be nice so we can get a more accurate value to our collections.

The CIB Magical Chase price for Turbografx-16 has captured a repro game for $125 from 3/24/2024.  I've reported it several times and it hasn't been removed.  It's a huge outlier that definitely suppressed the normal cost of CIB copies

Hi All,

A few months back a new (and pretty decent imo) trading card game was released by Fantasy Flight Games called Star Wars Unlimited and I would love to see collection and price tracking support of it on here. Like Lorcana, it's pretty easy to learn and welcoming to new card game players so I can see it becoming quite popular. It's only in wave 1 currently so at the time of this posting there would only be 262 cards to track (plus variants). Thanks for reading my post! 

To sell on here you need a paypal business account but switching to a business account limits using that account for online shopping, sending money to friends and family, etc.That aside, there are plenty of people who have issues with Paypal in general so there are a slew of topics asking for alternatives both from buyers and sellers. There are also bunch of topics where people request the option to trade through here.

What about introducing account trade credit? Like allow people to sell games on marketplace to build up trade credit and they can then use that trade credit to buy other games on the marketplace.

This would:
- be a relatively simple way to introduce trading
- remove the need for a personal paypal account to buy
- remove the need for a business paypal account to sell
- avoid the transfer fees, tax issues, and other mishegoss for people who want to do both
- actively promotes people listing/ selling games to buy other games

Of course, I'm not suggesting it be a closed system. People having an option to put money in and take money out is essential to any marketplace. If you're ride or die with Paypal exclusive, this still gives people a way to participate without using Paypal or you linking up with another platform like Stripe. Besides, floating trade credit on an account and trading in games toward other games is a staple of the gaming community.

I often come across game cartridges listings with titles including the string "new battery". These listings are categorized as new when they logically can't be. Would it be possible to have listings including the string "new" be categorized as new, unless they contain the string "new battery"?

Thanks

I understand that older eBay sales are not allowed to be reported due to the listing being deleted by eBay. The pictures and description of the item being thus unavailable for review. That being said, I don't see why we couldn't, even then, report a listing based solely on its title. The review of the sale could then be conducted based also on its title.

As an example of sales that are obviously misclassified but sadly cannot be reported, take new Arctic White Game Boy Advance systems sales:

• "2012-05-27    Nintendo Game Boy Advance Arctic Handheld System with 5 GAMES"
  • is obviously a bundle and should be deleted;
• "2021-08-02    Nintendo Game Boy Advance White Handheld System Working Brand New Batteries"
  • "Working" and "Brand New Batteries" indicate that this was not a NIB system;
• "2021-10-13    ¤ Nintendo Game Boy Advance White ¤ New Lens Working Console Handheld System"
  • "New Lens" and "Working" indicate once again that the advertised Game Boy was not new.

Ideally, a user who comes across these listing could report them just like any other listing, and the report could then be reviewed the same way. What do you think?